Qiy?s should not be used to affirm Sunnan for whatever the prophet ( - ) has not done, abandoning it is in itself of following the Sunnah.

The third: The Jumu‘ah Sal?t is an independent Sal?t that has nothing to do with Thuhr Sal?t. The former has: a certain number of Rak‘ahs, the Khutbah and preconditions though it is done at the same time in which the later is done.

According to these numerous differences between them; the Jumu‘ah Sal?t can not be considered similar to Thur Sal?t. (1)

The fourth: Al-Bukh?r? narrated in his “Sah?h” a had?th traced back to Ibn ‘Umar ( - رضي الله عنه -) to have said: ‘I have done [N?filah Sal?t] with the prophet ( - ); two Rak‘ahs before Thuhr Sal?t, Two Rak‘ahs after it, two Rak‘ahs after Maghrib Sal?t, two Rak‘ahs after Ish?’ Sal?t and two Rak‘ahs after Jumu‘ah Sal?t’. (2)

This had?th indicates that the Sah?bah ( - ) considered Thuhr and Jumu‘ah Sal?t as two independent Salaw?t. Besides, he [i.e. Ibn ‘Umar] never made mention of a pre-Sunnah Sal?t for the Jumu‘ah Sal?t; he only made mention of a post-Sunnah Sal?t the thing which affirms the legality of the latter only. (3)

The fifth: If the Jumu‘ah Sal?t were to be considered a shortened form of Thuhr Sal?t, then no N?filah Sal?t should be