تخطَّ إلى المحتوى
الفهرس

for his sake. The soldiers of the State had found in his camera a recording of the centers and locations of the State while the talk of an American strike was taking place".

So if these people are apostates according to you then this is a contradiction! How do you criticize others for that which you do yourselves!

As for fighting alongside the Muslim Brotherhood against the Houthis, we say: Is everyone affiliated to the Muslim Brotherhood disbelievers according to you? (1) If the answer is no, but rather they are innovators, then you should consider the words of Sheikh Abu Musab al Zarqawi:

"Sheikh Abdullah Al Janaabi is a Sufi with whom we differ, and we do not agree with him. And despite this, Sheikh Abu Anas Ash Shami, may Allah have mercy upon him, would kiss his head. And we used to hope good for him and we used to wish that we bring him to the path of the Salaf. And Sheikh Abu Anas had given him one of the books of Sheikh Ibn Taymiyyah. So what would we need from this man if he was raising the banner of Jihad and calling to fight the enemies of the Muslims? By Allah, we consider him to be better than those who discourage and sit back from Jihad .... So oh my brother, bring to me a Sufi who has innovations who fights in the path of Allah, I will kiss his feet, and he is better for me than the one who sits back even if he claims to have the correct Aqeedah. So as long as a man remains as a Muslim and a Mujahid, then he is upon goodness, and he is better that the one who sits back whatever it may be. However his Jihad does not prevent me from repudiating his innovation, and this does not make me abandon supporting him ... . As for the innovator, we show patience over him and we preach to him and we fight alongside him and we do not leave him in his mistakes or flatter him, and we continue giving him Da'wah until he returns to the Sunnah. (2)

So has Zarqawi deviated?!

The Islamic State of Iraq issued a statement (3) in which it classified all factions in Iraq into three categories including the Muslim Brotherhood about whom it said "It is known that they dilute issues of Aqeedah and they have adopted the idea of democratic elections and they have made it to be the same as Shura by their claims, and they also allow participating in secular governments under the pretext of benefits and harms". And they said about the second movement to be "Factions who raise the slogans of Salafiyyah and the Manhaj of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah, however they conceal in their dealings the Manhaj of the Muslim Brotherhood in many of the issues of the Shariah whether

(1) For example the previous leader of the Islamic State of Iraq, Abu Umar al Baghdadi said while speaking about the branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in Iraq known as "Al Hizb ul Islami" (The Islamic Party) - "And we do not believe those who are entering it to have fallen into Kufr, if the evidences of the Shareeah has not been established for them". (Refer to the Speech "Say: I am upon a clear evidence from my Lord", 13 March 2007, Al Furqan Foundation) - That is, they are considered as Muslims.

(2) Conversation between Abul Yamaan Al Baghdadi and Abu Musab Al Zarqawi, page 23/24

(3) Statement with the title "A clear saying about the reality of the revolution brigade of the twentys" which was published by "Al Fajr Media Centre" on 22 September 2007 in Al Shumookh Forum in the section "Archive of statements and reports of the Islamic State" by the account (forum member) "Muraasil Ash-Shubkah" which only publishes official releases.

من الذي انحرف؟! · الصفحة ٧١

النص من نسخ المكتبة الشاملة. ترقيم الصفحات كما في الأصل الرقمي، وقد لا يوافق المطبوع في بعض الكتب.

من الذي انحرف؟!ص ٧١