Muslims in, and that is the Sheikh, the scholar, the Muhajir, the Mujahid, the modest one, the adviser, the ascetic Athiyathullah al Libbi" (1)

This is despite the fact that Sheikh Athiyyatullah had held the same beliefs for which they attacked Shaykh Ayman al Zawahiri! Rather it was even more and greater ... !

So what is the difference between this and that? Only because of disagreement with them!!

As for Sheikh Sulaimaan al Ulwaan (2) , all of us know that Abu Maysara al Shaami is the media face of ISIS for writing in all of the issues of its official magazine "Dabiq".

Abu Maysara As-Shaaami says in his article entitled "Al Hazmi between the major sin of sitting behind and the misguidance of the Jaamiyyah" that:

"The students of Jihad - during the time when Jihad would be an individual obligation - would not take their knowledge from those sitting behind, let alone from the innovator, let alone from the scholars of the Tawagheet. They used to give preference to the knowledge of the Imams of Tawheed and Jihad who have passed away, over and above the arts of the contemporary ones from amongst the Faasiqs (major sinners) who sit behind and flatter ... . Then the lines of the Mujahideen got split when they brought near them some of those sitting behind like Al Maqdisi (who used to consider the Jihad in Iraq to be a holocaust) and (Sulayman) Al Ulwaan (refer if you wish to the refutation of the martyred Shaykh Sultan ibn Bajad al Utaybi against him, as it is important and shows his strange position towards Aal Salool and their soldiers), and the misguided ones from the Surooris and Hizbul Ummah like Al-Turaifi and Al-Ajami and Al-Mutairi."

From this text the following things can be understood:

- That Sheikh Sulaymaan Al Ulwaan is from the Fasiqs (major sinners) who sit behind.

- That Sheikh Sulaymaan Al Ulwaan is from those who split the ranks of the Mujahideen

- Sheikh Sulimaan al Ulwaan, the Surooris and Hizbutul Ummah have all been put under the same category.