- That they have thrown the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, behind the wall, and followed their own desires!

- That they have called towards garbage!

- That they have endorsed the Fiqh of surrendering (to the enemies), and beautified it!

- All that Adnani mentioned above!!!

- And are these descriptions similarly applicable to Sheikh Usama, Sheikh Naser al Fahad, Turki Bin'ali and all those supporters of ISIS who participated in a peaceful sit-in?!

And in the end, we will arrive at these two results:

- That Adnani intended the first one, which is that Al Qaida has replaced Jihad and restricted it to peaceful means, and in that case, he would be a liar.

- Or that he intended the second one, that is, a mere belief in peaceful means is an indication of deviation. And in that case, then all of these leaders and men whose names have just been mentioned would be deviated, including his group ISIS.

And let us not forget to deal with the point that Adnani has mentioned in the same discourse, and it is that the new methodology of Al Qaida is shy to mention the word "Jihad" and so it has replaced this word with words like revolution, popularity, uprising, conflict, struggle, republic and propagation.

If they have indeed become ashamed of the word Jihad, then they would have removed the name Jihad from the name of their organization in the first place, as the name of the organization is "Tanzeem Qaidathul Jihad". So the word "Jihad" is present in its name. So how would they become embarrassed from the word "Jihad" while the word Jihad is present in its name?!

And we will make a comparison between these words and the mention of Jihad!

- In the speech "Faith defeats arrogance" by Dr. Al Zawahiri, he mentioned "Jihad" 20 times and the word "revolution" only once.

- In the speech "Liberation from the circle of futility and failure" by Dr. Al Zawahiri, he mentioned "Jihad" 21 times and "revolution" 6 times.

- In the speech "Being united in confronting the Thaghout" by Dr. Al Zawahiri, he mentioned "Jihad" 10 times and did not mention revolution at all.

If it was a methodology which is ashamed of using the word "Jihad", then he has mentioned "Jihad" 51 times as against mentioning 7 times those words which Adnani claimed that he has replaced them for the word Jihad! So then what would have happened if he was not shy of Jihad?!